10 Jul 2001
Slatkin Investors Ask IRS to Drop Bankruptcy Claim
Courts: Money manager's ex-clients say government's demand for $11.8 million
would be a double penalty.
Clients of bankrupt money manager Reed E. Slatkin want the Internal Revenue
Service to forgo its $11.8-million claim for unpaid taxes in the case, saying
the government's demand would unfairly dilute the few assets available to pay
investors.
The IRS' claim against Slatkin would "doubly penalize" investors who for years
paid capital gains and income taxes on what were likely phantom profits, said
Richard Wynne, attorney for the bankruptcy court creditors' committee that
represents investors.
IRS officials said they could not comment on the case. Slatkin, who had operated
a money management firm in Santa Barbara since the mid-1980s, filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy May 1 after being sued by investors. He is under criminal
investigation for investment fraud.
Bankruptcy Court officials say investor claims in the case could reach $600
million. Slatkin has less than $30 million in brokerage accounts, Wynne said.
Investigators believe another $100 million was funneled into real estate and
limited partnerships, although the value of those holdings has not yet been
determined, Wynne said.
IRS claims typically have high priority in bankruptcy cases, and are frequently
paid in full before remaining assets are divided among other creditors,
bankruptcy experts said.
Slatkin's investors could make a case that they paid more in taxes on bogus
returns than the U.S. Treasury would recoup, but that argument is unlikely to
sway the IRS, said Los Angeles bankruptcy attorney J. Scott Bovitz.
"I've never seen it happen" that the IRS withdrew a bankruptcy claim, Bovitz
said.
Slatkin's investors paid millions of dollars in taxes over the years on the
gains Slatkin showed on their quarterly statements, said investor George V.
Kriste, a radio station owner.
In the last few years, Slatkin began reporting more short-term gains on his
investors' statements, increasing their tax burden, Kriste said. Short-term
gains are taxed at higher rates than long-term gains.
Investors may be able to amend their tax returns for the last three or four
years to claim refunds if criminal investigators prove that Slatkin was
operating a Ponzi scheme, with some investors' money used to pay bogus returns
to other investors, tax experts said.
But tax law won't allow Slatkin's investors to claim refunds for taxes paid in
earlier years. Federal law requires refund claims be made within three years
after a return's due date. California has a four-year limit for state tax
purposes.
The Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that Slatkin conducted a
fraudulent investment operation since he began taking in money from a group of
fellow Scientologists in 1985. Slatkin's unregistered money management business
eventually expanded to include Hollywood celebrities, Internet moguls and
socialites from across the country. Slatkin also was a co-founder of Earthlink
Inc., one of the three largest Internet service providers.
Slatkin settled with the SEC last month, agreeing not to violate securities laws
in the future while neither admitting nor denying the allegations. The criminal
investigation into his activities continues, however.
The FBI in May raided Slatkin's home and offices, as well as the home of an
associate, Ronald L. Rakow.
Rakow, a former manager for the Grateful Dead, pleaded guilty to one felony
count of mail fraud in 1987 and was sentenced to a year in prison for his role
in an Irvine-based milk-culture investment scheme. More than 27,000 people
nationwide spent $80 million to purchase culture-growing kits after being
promised their cultures would be purchased to make women's cosmetics.
State regulators said the operation was actually a huge, illegal pyramid scheme
in which the cultures that were purchased were recycled into new kits to be sold
to investors.
Return to The Reverend Reed Slatkin main index page
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author
or authors which copyrighted and wrote them and may not reflect the views
and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank. The
term "Scientology"® is trademarked to the Scientology crime
syndicate. This information is provided in Fair Use for the public safety
in the hopes that others don't fall for Scientology's related frauds.