wgert-Posted Document came from Moxon & Kobrin Offices
wgert-Posted Document came from Moxon & Kobrin Offices
A quote from Stephen Mitchell, plaintiff in the $190-million libel
suit against the Church of Spiritual Technology:
"The document cover-page that the so-called 'wgert'
posted to alt.binaries.scientology, which had my name, and
the name of the other plaintiff in our case, Kathleen Carey,
at the top - and had an excerpt from the docuemnt pasted
crosswise over it - was our response to the Church of
Spiritual Technology's demand for documents.
"That document was mailed to the offices of Moxon &
Kobrin - and NOWHERE ELSE - on 11 September with proof of
service.
"We never filed that response in the court as a public
document, since it deals with discovery, and would only be
filed at the time of trial.
"Therefore, the only place this document could have
been accessed is at the offices of Moxon & Kobrin, counsel
for the Church of Spiritual Technology - the defendant in
our case."
Mitchell also pointed out that another one of the documents posted to
a.b.s. had the name "Edwin G. Richardson" in the FAX heading,
upside down at the bottom of the document. Richardson is a P.I. known
to do work for the church. This, said Mitchell, posted with the other
document (which had ONLY been in the possession of CST attorney
Kendrick Moxon), provably ties Moxon, Richardson, CST and
"wgert" together - which will be extremely useful in regards
to all posts by "wgert."
The other plaintiff in the case, Kathleen Carey, is quoted as saying:
"CST, through Moxon, tried in their last court-filed
document to characterize our suit as an 'annoyance' suit to
'force a settlement' out of the 'deep pockets' of CST. They
keep trying to pretend that the issue is money, they keep
trying to discredit us, all to avoid the real issues in the
case.
"They still don't understand that it has never been
about money, and never will be. It's about restoring L. Ron
Hubbard to his rightful place as the Source of Scientology,
and exposing what has been done to his works, and exposing
what has been done by the misuse of his name.
"Peripheral side-shows and smear tactics - none of
which have anything to do with the issues in the case - are
not going to dissuade us. Stephen and I are the plaintiffs
in this case. Sooner or later, when their side-shows have
all blown away in the wind, they're going to have to answer
the questions, they are going to have to answer for what
they have done, and they are going to have to deal with us
in court."
(end of original message)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can view this message and the related discussion by following
this link:
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Date: 1998/09/26
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.