It's great to be able to get so many cult followers to donate materials
to The Skeptic Tank so that anyone doing research on cult mentality may
observe the phenomena straight from the horse's mouth.
After you review the text which seeks to defend cult leader Jimmy Swaggart,
take a look at
http://www.raids.org/hs/ for an interesting detailed
discussion about the dynamics of cults.
Okay here it goes even though I know you only allow Christians to
comment so that you could bash them. But that doesn't matter. I feel
that you really must be searching for something to believe in. I don't
think anybody would waste their time to try to dig up so much dirt on
someone that they only know through the Tabloids, cut, pasted, and
edited news clips and heresay. Yet all of the so called "proof"
you use to back your beliefs in your whole web page are powered by heresay.
For someone to go through that much trouble, you must be searching! One
true fact though is that all of the so called "knowleged ones"
like yourself never get the COURAGE or the GUTS to go down south and talk
with the man yourself.
Well I'm going to leave now and I'm sure your going to talk about me or
who knows maybe even edit this letter to suit your web.
j> Okay here it goes even though I know you only allow Christians
How could I allow or disallow anyone to say anything? Isn't censorship
something that the religious cults among us do? And isn't freedom of speech
and expression something that historically atheists have always advocated?
If you can come up with some explanation for how I or anyone else can keep
you or any other cultist from commenting upon anything, do please get back to
me as I'm greatly curious.
j> But that doesn't matter.
More so since it's a straw man creation of your own doing.
j> I feel that you really must be searching for something to believe in.
That's not surprising. Cultists who are faced with the embarrassing
weakness which drove them to contrive deity constructs find it ever so
much more embarrassing when faced with the fact that there are others
which are strong enough to live without contriving fictional delusions.
The anger and resentment that you feel when confronted with others who
aren't as weak, ignorant, and gullible as you would naturally prompt you
to try to pretend that everyone else is really -- deep down -- just as
weak, ignorant, and gullible as you.
To accept the truth means that there's something wrong with you.
j> I don't think anybody would waste their time to try to dig up
<laughing!> Your master was photographed "meeting"
prostitutes inside the many rooms of the "No-Tell Motel." Yes,
that's a "digging up the dirt" investigation worthy of Scotland
Yard, huh? <smile>
j> cut, pasted, and edited news clips and heresay.
Oh yes, photographs of your master screwing prostitutes is
"heresay." <smile> Loving it.
j> Yet all of the so called "proof"
Why is is that cultists can never seem to learn what constitutes
evidence and that proof is for mathematics and alcohol?
j> you use to back your beliefs in your whole web page are powered by heresay.
Except that belief doesn't factor into the embarrassing truth. What we find
is that cult followers will cling to any lie in order to salvage what
they know are lies.
j> For someone to go through that much trouble, you must be searching!
<smile> Oh yes, it took years of constant effort to put together
the newspaper accounts and public confessions of your master into a web
page. You wouldn't believe how many people it took to cut-and-paste the
ASCII text detailing the embarrassing truths about your master.
j> One true fact though is that all of the so called "knowleged ones"
Ah, yes. Ignore all of the facts about the cult leader and go down and
listen to the cult leader himself. You'll see. The public exposures are
all no doubt part of the conspiracy and should just be dismissed. All of
the photographs were manufactured at the CIA in Virginia, huh?
j> Well I'm going to leave now and I'm sure your going to talk about
One thing we love to do here at The Skeptic Tank is expose the irrationality,
illiteracy, and gullibility of cult followers, yes.
But you'll be happy to know that I've updated my Jimmy Swaggart web page
and will be asking around to see if I can get some scanned-in photographs
of your master and several of his hookers. I'll also see if I can get a
photograph of the 7-year-old girl he wanted to screw so that we can get all
of the evil of the cult leader exposed.
Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Jones, David Duke, and Vernon "David Koresh"
Howel will also eventually get fully covered right along-side of your
master, I might add.
j> Your "theories" only confirm that your web page needs a name
That's strange. While some of your message made it to this system, the
specific areas of concern about which you are complaining must have gotten
`lost' somewhere in the network.
That seems to happen a lot to people who get resentful at accidentally
looking at unauthorized facts. Somewhere sitting on some huge server with
unimaginable amounts of disk storage space there are countless millions
of messages written by fundies which contain all the reasoned, intelligent,
educated text. Only the idiotic, illiterate, disjointed, ignorant rants
and hate spew manage to escape this hypothetical, unstoppable server.
js> You play with your verbage and use very BIIIIIIIIIGGGG WOOORRRDDSSS!
It's more commonly known as "having an education," John. There
are a great many benefits of having one. Observe how easily one is able
to debunk the willfully ignorant and the superstitious when one has an
education.
js> but when it comes right down to the "nitty gritty",
That is to say, what your _masters_ programmed into you to say and to
believe. You, unfortunately, had no occasion to make any determination
about your unfortunate occultism since, I'm quite certain, you were
indoctrinated into the occult from a very young age.
One is, sadly, indoctrinated into the cult of one's parents. Had you been
born in Iran, you would be ranting about some other gods, you know, and be
just as pathetically ignorant and uneducated.
How unfortunate.
js> A bunch of NOISE fueled by ALOT of HOT AIR!
If you're at all interested in improving your poor education, might I suggest
that you at least learn that "alot" isn't a word? That's
illiterate. What you want to do is spell it "a lot." That way
no one could accidentally mistake you for a moron.
While we're helping you discover ways to improve yourself, are you aware
of the the "walk away" services which The Skeptic Tank provides?
If you are needing courage to help you escape from your cult, you may
download a large number of testimonials from people just like you who
managed to acquire the courage they needed to just walk away. If you're
search for help, click on:
You talk the "Talk" but can only walk the walk through fancy
twists of the tongue and filthy worded remarks.
This as ALWAYS, is the way of heathen.
Again, like I said before, your filthy tongue shows not only your I.Q.
but your ignorance. You believe only what suits your web. I didn't say
the man was innocent in reference to the event, what I'm trying to get
across is that humans fail. That's right my friend even YOU. That sick
and perverted reference to a 7 year old girl came from the heresay words
of a prostitute and you just flatly believe it without any proof. THIS
IS THE VERY THING THAT YOU ACCUSE CHRISTIANS OF DOING?!?!. Believing
something without any proof!. BOY you seemed to get mixed up don't you.
The unforgiveness and bitterness that you hold towards the man is
just more proof that the world is filled with evil and corruption.
j> Again, like I said before, your filthy tongue shows
That's strange. You "forgot" to provide specifics again. How
curious. Perhaps you could attempt to correct that oversight the next
time your masters instruct you to unthinkingly mouth off a rant.
j> You believe only what suits your web.
That's strange. You didn't offer any specifics here, either. Curious.
j> I didn't say the man was innocent in reference to the event,
More so when they're extremist Christian cultists, I know. Your point
was what, again?
j> That's right my friend even YOU.
Except that when I do so I recognize the fact and don't repeat it.
Cultists, on the other hand, ignore the fact and pretend they may continue
on as if it just didn't matter.
Cultists like yourself and your hero, I point out.
j> That sick and perverted reference to a 7 year old girl came
Which your master repeatedly hired to screw.
j> and you just flatly believe it without any proof.
In fact had any of it been even slightly in error, your master would have
sued her pants off. And then screwed her for $20.00 again.
j> THIS IS THE VERY THING THAT YOU ACCUSE CHRISTIANS OF DOING?!?!.
That's strange. You "forgot" to provide any specifics again.
Golly.
j> Believing something without any proof!.
Just ignore the photographs that were taken of your master outside of the
No-Tell Motel and try your best you convince yourself that no evidence
exists.
j> BOY you seemed to get mixed up don't you.
I'm not the one trying desperately to cling to a dishonest cult master
caught with his dick up some prostitute.
j> The unforgiveness and bitterness that you hold towards the man is
And Christianity is the cause for most of the evil the world knows. Or
don't you know the history of your cult?
You keep referring to me as a cultist. What do you think the Atheist
belief is??!
You're the one with the "web page" not me! and you're calling
ME a cultist? (laughs)
You really need a life bud. Maybe you should REALLY consider Jesus.
j> You keep referring to me as a cultist.
Don't you have any idea what constitutes a cult, dear? Or must someone
look it up for you and explain it to you slowly? Or perhaps you would
prefer that Barney sing it to you?
j> What do you think the Atheist belief is??!
<laughing!> Capitalizing the word won't turn it into a political
party, you know. And trying to pretend that the lack of a belief in all
the gods and goddesses some how constitutes a belief is like trying to
pretend that bald is a hair color.
You cultists will unthinkingly mouth off any absurdity, huh?
j> You're the one with the "web page" not me!
You're the cultist trying desperately to defend your cult master, not I.
j> and you're calling ME a cultist? (laughs)
Be sure to get the blue collar with that new jacket that has arms which tie
in the back. And while you're restrained from hurting yourself further, do
spend some time looking up the meaning of the word "cultist."
j> You really need a life bud. Maybe you should REALLY consider Jesus.
Oh yes, I consider many fictional Alpha Male constructs every day. Lord
Krishna is a superior one to your fictional construct, I might add, and
hasn't been given the horrible body count that your cult has attributable
to it.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
From: jors@webtv.net
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:15:31 -0600
To: frice@skptictank.org
Subject: Jimmy Swaggart
From: "Fredric L. Rice" <frice@raids.org>
Date: Sun Mar 15 10:03:25 1998
To: jors@webtv.net
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
j> to comment so that you could bash them.
From: "Fredric L. Rice" <frice@raids.org>
Date: Sun Mar 15 10:09:17 1998
To: jors@webtv.net
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
j> so much dirt on someone that they only know through the Tabloids,
From: "Fredric L. Rice" <frice@raids.org>
Date: Sun Mar 15 10:15:36 1998
To: jors@webtv.net
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
j> like yourself never get the COURAGE or the GUTS to go down south and
j> talk with the man yourself.
j> me or who knows maybe even edit this letter to suit your web.
From: "Fredric L. Rice" <frice@raids.org>
Date: Thu Mar 19 16:03:16 1998
To: JOHNGEORGINA@webtv.net (JOHN SANTIAGO)
Subject: Re: web site
j> change from the "Skeptic tank" to the "SEPTIC TANK"
j> or did you just mispell the original title?
From: "Fredric L. Rice" <frice@raids.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:49:26 -0800
To: JOHNGEORGINA@webtv.net (JOHN SANTIAGO)
Subject: Re: web site
js> you end up saying what I thought you said all along.
From: jors@webtv.net
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 02:06:39 -0600
To: frice@raids.org (Fredric L. Rice)
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
From: jors@webtv.net
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 02:15:31 -0600
To: frice@raids.org (Fredric L. Rice)
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
From: "Fredric L. Rice" <frice@raids.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:49:00 -0800
To: jors@webtv.net
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
j> not only your I.Q. but your ignorance.
j> what I'm trying to get across is that humans fail.
j> from the heresay words of a prostitute
j> just more proof that the world is filled with evil and corruption.
From: jors@webtv.net
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 02:18:53 -0600
To: frice@raids.org (Fredric L. Rice)
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
From: "Fredric L. Rice" >frice@raids.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:49:04 -0800
To: jors@webtv.net
Subject: Re: Jimmy Swaggart
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page.
Cult Dynamics: http://www.raids.org/hs/cultdyn.htm